G2 Reviews: How They Work, Rewards, Trustworthiness, and More

What is G2 and how does it work?

G2, formerly known as G2 Crowd, evolved from Gridwise in 2012 to become the world’s largest B2B software marketplace. With over 1.5 million verified reviews, this platform has transformed how businesses evaluate technology solutions by providing authentic user feedback instead of relying solely on vendor claims or traditional analyst reports.

What is the purpose of G2?

G2’s core mission is to provide a transparent environment where business professionals can access authentic peer review content about software products. Acting as a trusted verification platform, G2 helps buyers make informed decisions by aggregating real user experiences rather than vendor marketing materials. According to Wikipedia, G2 functions as “the industry’s leading review platform,” with a database covering over 100,000 products across hundreds of categories, making it an essential resource for both buyers researching solutions and vendors seeking market validation.

How does G2 collect and display reviews?

G2’s review collection process begins when users submit detailed feedback through standardized forms that capture both quantitative ratings and qualitative insights. The platform verifies reviewer identity through business email validation and optional LinkedIn verification to ensure authenticity. Each submission undergoes automated and manual screening to maintain quality standards.

Reviews are organized using G2’s proprietary Grid® methodology, which plots products on a matrix based on customer satisfaction and market presence. This visual representation helps buyers quickly identify leading solutions within specific categories. The methodology transforms thousands of data points into accessible comparative formats, allowing for side-by-side evaluation of competing products while highlighting strengths and weaknesses across consistent evaluation criteria.

Review Component	Purpose
Star Ratings	Quantitative assessment across multiple dimensions
Pros & Cons	Qualitative insights about strengths and limitations
Use Case	Context for how the reviewer used the product
Likelihood to Recommend	Net Promoter Score indicator
Verification Badge	Confirms reviewer identity has been authenticated

Who can submit a review on G2?

G2 maintains strict verification standards to ensure review authenticity. Anyone with legitimate product experience can submit feedback, but G2 employs multiple validation mechanisms before publishing. Each potential reviewer must meet specific eligibility requirements that filter out fraudulent submissions while preserving genuine user perspectives.

• Valid business software users with firsthand experience using the product
• Must provide a verified corporate email address (not personal domains like Gmail)
• Required to create a LinkedIn account connection for additional verification
• Cannot be affiliated with the vendor or a direct competitor
• Must agree to G2’s terms of service and content guidelines

How does G2 pay for reviews?

G2 distributes over 10,000 gift cards monthly to reviewers through its rewards program, making it one of the most active incentivized review platforms in the B2B sector. This systematic approach to compensation has generated controversy but also enabled G2 to build its massive review database that powers buying decisions for millions of software purchasers globally.

Does G2 really pay for reviews?

Yes, G2 genuinely rewards users for submitting detailed, high-quality reviews. The platform offers compensation primarily through gift card incentives rather than direct cash payments. G2 justifies this practice as a fair exchange of value—reviewers contribute their time and expertise, helping other buyers while receiving modest compensation for their efforts. Unlike some platforms that hide incentivization, G2 is transparent about its rewards program, viewing it as a legitimate method to encourage participation while maintaining its marketplace quality through strict verification processes that filter out low-quality submissions.

How do you earn money on G2 review?

To earn rewards on G2, users must first create your account using a verified business email, then locate products they’ve used and submit comprehensive reviews meeting G2’s quality standards. The platform prioritizes detailed feedback that includes balanced perspectives on pros and cons, use cases, and specific feature evaluations rather than generic praise or criticism.

G2 frequently runs specialized campaigns offering premium rewards for reviews in underrepresented categories or emerging technologies. The platform may also provide enhanced incentives for longer, more detailed assessments or video testimonials. According to the G2 help center sharing the email with colleagues can also earn additional rewards through referral bonuses when those individuals submit qualified reviews.

How much does G2 pay reviewers?

G2’s reward structure varies based on product category, review depth, and current promotional campaigns. The platform offers different compensation tiers designed to reflect the value and scarcity of specific types of feedback. Enterprise software reviews typically receive higher compensation than reviews for simpler tools due to the complexity and cost of the products being evaluated.

Review Type	Typical Reward Value	Requirements
Standard Software Review	$10-25 gift card	Complete review with pros/cons
Enterprise Software Review	$25-50 gift card	In-depth analysis of complex products
Video Review	$40-100 gift card	Authentic video testimonial with usage details
Niche Category Review	Up to $50 gift card	Feedback on products with limited reviews

Reward amounts may increase during special promotional periods or for targeted campaigns seeking reviews in specific product categories. G2 also occasionally offers bonus incentives for reviewers who maintain active profiles and contribute regularly to the platform’s knowledge base.

Can I get paid for doing G2 reviews?

Yes, you can receive compensation for submitting authentic G2 reviews if you meet their eligibility criteria. To qualify, you must have genuine experience with the product, possess a verifiable business email domain, and provide substantive feedback that helps potential buyers. The process requires creating a G2 profile, verifying your identity, and submitting detailed reviews that meet quality standards. While not everyone qualifies for rewards (consultants and competitors are often excluded), most legitimate business users with firsthand product experience can participate in the rewards program by following G2’s verification protocols.

Are there limits or eligibility for payments?

G2 implements several restrictions on its reward program to maintain review quality and prevent system abuse. These limitations ensure the platform collects diverse perspectives while preventing individual reviewers from dominating specific product categories or gaming the system for financial gain.

• One review per product per user—multiple reviews of the same software are not rewarded
• Quarterly limits on total compensated reviews (typically 5-10 per quarter)
• Minimum word count requirements (usually 150+ words) for reward eligibility
• Mandatory completion of all review sections, including pros, cons, and use cases
• Verification checks that may delay reward distribution by 7-10 business days
• Geographic restrictions on gift card redemption options in certain countries

Understanding G2’s ratings and ranking system

G2’s Grid® methodology functions as a map of the software ecosystem, guiding buyers through complex purchasing decisions by visually representing product performance. This sophisticated ranking system has become the industry’s standard reference point, with vendors and buyers alike closely monitoring position changes each quarter.

What is the G2 ranking and how is it calculated?

The G2 Grid® is a quadrant-based visualization that positions products based on two primary dimensions: customer satisfaction and market presence. This creates four distinct categories—Leaders (high scores in both dimensions), High Performers (high satisfaction but lower market presence), Contenders (strong market presence but lower satisfaction), and Niche players (lower scores in both areas). This intuitive framework helps buyers quickly identify which solutions dominate their category while spotting rising challengers.

G2’s algorithm calculates rankings using a proprietary methodology that weights various data inputs. According to G2’s documentation on scoring methodologies, satisfaction scores derive primarily from authenticated user reviews, analyzing ratings across multiple dimensions including ease of use, quality of support, and likelihood to recommend. Market presence combines company metrics like employee count, web presence, and growth rate with product-specific data such as review volume, recency, and social impact. The algorithm also adjusts for review quality, applying higher weights to more detailed, verified assessments from established users.

What factors influence G2 scores?

G2’s scoring algorithm weighs multiple factors to determine both satisfaction and market presence scores. These components are regularly recalibrated to maintain accuracy and reflect evolving market dynamics. The relative importance of each factor varies by product category, with enterprise software categories placing more emphasis on implementation and administration metrics compared to simpler tools.

Score Component	Weight	Key Factors
Review Ratings	50-70%	Star ratings across multiple dimensions
Review Quality	10-15%	Depth, recency, and verification level
Market Presence	20-30%	Employee count, funding, age of reviews
Social Media Presence	5-10%	Mentions, followers, engagement
External Data	5-10%	Web traffic, partner ecosystem size

How frequently are rankings updated?

G2 updates its Grid® rankings quarterly, releasing new reports in January, April, July, and October. This regular cadence allows the platform to incorporate fresh review data while providing enough time to identify meaningful trends rather than temporary fluctuations. Each update uses a rolling data collection period spanning the previous 12 months, with greater weight given to more recent reviews. Additionally, G2 publishes specialized seasonal reports highlighting trending products, market movements, and emerging categories that have shown significant activity during specific quarters.

Trust and transparency on G2

Can we truly trust online reviews when incentives are involved? This question looms large for G2 users. While the platform has implemented numerous safeguards to maintain review integrity, the balance between growth incentives and authentication measures creates an ongoing tension that both buyers and vendors must navigate when interpreting G2’s extensive review database.

Can G2 reviews be anonymous?

G2 strikes a balance between reviewer privacy and accountability through a tiered verification approach. While reviewers must provide verified business credentials during submission (including corporate email addresses and optional LinkedIn verification), they can choose to publish reviews with limited public identity information. This “anonymity with accountability” model requires backend verification while allowing reviewers to control their public visibility. Many choose this option when providing critical feedback about vendors they currently work with or when company policies restrict public endorsements, ensuring honest feedback without professional repercussions.

Is G2 unbiased?

G2’s incentivized review model inevitably raises questions about potential bias. The platform compensates reviewers with gift cards—a practice that increases participation but may also attract those motivated primarily by rewards rather than a desire to share genuine experiences. This creates an inherent tension in the review ecosystem.

To counterbalance these concerns, G2 employs extensive verification processes including email validation, LinkedIn verification, and fraud detection algorithms. According to SlashExperts’ analysis of G2’s trust mechanisms, these measures successfully filter out most fraudulent submissions while maintaining review quality. However, buyers should still consider potential incentive bias when interpreting reviews, particularly for products with limited feedback.

Are reviews vetted for authenticity?

G2 employs a multi-layered verification system to authenticate reviews before publication. Each submission undergoes both automated screening and human moderation to ensure compliance with quality standards and detect potentially fraudulent content. This vetting process aims to maintain marketplace integrity while processing the high volume of daily submissions.

• Mandatory business email verification with domain screening against consumer email providers
• Optional but encouraged LinkedIn profile connection for additional identity confirmation
• Automated detection algorithms that flag suspicious patterns in review submission behavior
• Human content moderators who manually review flagged submissions and random samples
• Vendor challenges that allow companies to dispute reviews they believe violate G2’s policies

Despite these safeguards, no system is perfect, and sophisticated attempts to manipulate reviews occasionally succeed, requiring ongoing vigilance from both G2 and its user community.

How does G2 handle fake or incentivized reviews?

G2 employs sophisticated detection methods to identify potentially fraudulent reviews, including pattern recognition algorithms that flag suspicious submission clusters and linguistic analysis tools that detect content inconsistencies. The platform also monitors IP addresses and submission timestamps to identify coordinated review campaigns that might indicate manipulation attempts by vendors or competitors.

When suspicious reviews are detected, G2’s trust team initiates a comprehensive investigation that may include verifying reviewer credentials, requesting additional documentation, or contacting reviewers directly to confirm authenticity. Reviews determined to violate policies are promptly removed, while borderline cases receive warning flags visible to readers. For serious or repeated violations, G2 imposes escalating penalties on responsible parties, ranging from temporary restrictions to permanent platform bans. Vendors found orchestrating fake reviews may have their profiles suspended or prominently labeled with trust violation notices.

Pros and cons of using G2 as a reviewer

The relationship between reviewers and platforms like G2 represents a complex value exchange—contributors provide valuable insights that power the marketplace while receiving various benefits in return. But is this exchange truly equitable, and what should potential reviewers consider before participating?

Benefits of sharing your opinion on G2

Contributing your insights to G2 offers multiple advantages beyond the obvious monetary rewards. By leaving a review on the platform, you join a community of professionals helping shape technology purchasing decisions while potentially advancing your own career and industry influence.

• Financial incentives through gift cards ranging from $10-100 depending on product category
• Professional visibility as your insights reach thousands of potential technology buyers
• Networking opportunities with vendors who often respond to detailed feedback
• Influence on product development as companies frequently implement reviewer suggestions
• Access to exclusive content and reports normally reserved for paying subscribers
• Recognition through G2’s reviewer rankings and contribution badges
• Knowledge expansion by exploring related products suggested based on review history

Potential drawbacks or scams to avoid

While G2 offers legitimate rewards, reviewers should remain vigilant about potential issues. Some vendors attempt to game the system by soliciting overly positive reviews or offering additional compensation beyond G2’s program—practices that violate platform policies. Be wary of direct solicitations promising excessive rewards or requesting specific ratings. Additionally, some users report delays in receiving promised gift cards or encounter redemption limitations in certain countries. Always verify reward campaigns through official G2 channels and never share sensitive account credentials or personal financial information when submitting reviews. Legitimate G2 communications always originate from verified domains and never request payment information.

Is reviewing on G2 worth your time?

Whether G2 reviewing justifies your time investment depends on your objectives. For those primarily seeking compensation, the platform offers modest but reliable rewards—typically $15-30 per qualified review, translating to a reasonable hourly rate given the 15-20 minutes required for thoughtful submissions. However, the greater value often comes from professional visibility, particularly for consultants and industry specialists. By providing insightful feedback on tools you genuinely use, you can establish expertise, connect with vendors, and potentially uncover new professional opportunities while helping fellow technology buyers.

G2 for vendors: how companies use the platform

With 95% of B2B buyers consulting online reviews before purchase decisions, G2 has become an essential channel for SaaS companies seeking market validation. Vendors increasingly view the platform not merely as a review collection tool but as a comprehensive marketing ecosystem with significant influence on buyer behavior.

How do businesses benefit from G2 reviews?

Companies leverage G2 profiles to build credibility, generate leads, and differentiate from competitors. Positive reviews serve as powerful social proof, while even critical feedback provides valuable product development insights that might otherwise require expensive research studies. Many businesses now incorporate G2 achievements directly into their marketing strategies.

G2 Achievement	Business Impact
Leader Quadrant Placement	42% increase in RFP inclusion rate
High Satisfaction Score (4.5+)	35% reduction in sales cycle length
Category Badges (Momentum Leader, etc.)	28% higher conversion on landing pages featuring badges
Review Volume (100+ reviews)	53% increase in buyer trust metrics
Software Review Quality Metrics	Improved lead generation by up to 40% when featuring detailed reviews

These metrics demonstrate why vendors increasingly invest in their G2 presence as a core component of their marketing and sales enablement strategies.

Can vendors influence reviews or ratings?

While G2 prohibits direct manipulation of reviews, vendors can legitimately influence their profiles through several approved methods. Companies may send review requests to their customer base, offer G2’s standard incentives, and respond publicly to feedback. However, paying customers for positive reviews, writing fake submissions, or selectively soliciting only satisfied users violates platform policies. G2 actively monitors for such violations through algorithmic detection and manual audits. The most effective strategy remains providing excellent products and customer service, then systematically encouraging all users to share their authentic experiences.

What marketing tools does G2 offer to businesses?

G2 provides vendors with a comprehensive suite of marketing tools designed to leverage review content throughout the buyer journey. These resources help companies amplify positive feedback while addressing concerns raised in critical reviews.

• Review Collection Campaigns – Custom landing pages and email templates to solicit customer feedback
• Competitor Comparison Reports – Side-by-side analysis of performance versus industry alternatives
• Marketing Content Library – Widgets, badges, and downloadable assets featuring G2 achievements
• Intent Data – Insights about buyers actively researching products in specific categories
• Premium Profile Customization – Enhanced branding, featured reviews, and promotional content options

These tools transform G2 from a passive review repository into an active marketing channel that many businesses now consider essential for market presence and competitive positioning.

SEO-Optimized FAQ on G2 Reviews

Our comprehensive FAQ addresses the most common questions about G2’s review ecosystem. Whether you’re considering writing your first review, evaluating products based on G2 ratings, or managing your company’s presence on the platform, these straightforward answers will clarify key aspects of G2’s operations.

Does G2 really pay for reviews?

Yes, G2 genuinely rewards reviewers with gift cards for sharing authentic product experiences. Their incentive program is designed to gather diverse feedback across thousands of software categories.

• Standard rewards typically range from $10-25 per qualifying review
• Compensation varies based on product category, review depth, and current campaigns
• Payment occurs through digital gift cards from major retailers rather than cash

This approach helps G2 maintain review volume and quality while compensating users for their time and expertise.

Can I trust G2 as a review platform?

G2 implements substantial verification measures that make it more reliable than many alternative review sites, including business email validation, LinkedIn verification, and algorithmic fraud detection. However, like all review platforms, it’s not immune to manipulation attempts. For best results, focus on detailed reviews with specific use cases rather than ratings alone, and compare multiple sources before making significant purchase decisions based on G2 feedback.

What is G2 ranking and how is it determined?

G2’s ranking system uses their proprietary Grid® methodology to position products based on verified user feedback and market presence data. The algorithm considers:

1. Customer satisfaction scores derived from authenticated user ratings across multiple dimensions
2. Market presence metrics including company size, growth trajectory, and social impact
3. Review volume, quality, and recency with greater weight given to detailed, recent feedback
4. External data sources including web presence, employee counts, and funding information

This multi-factor approach creates G2’s distinctive quadrant visualization showing Leaders, High Performers, Contenders, and Niche solutions.

How do you earn money by writing G2 reviews?

To earn rewards for write a review on G2, follow these steps:

1. Register using your business email address (personal emails like Gmail aren’t eligible)
2. Complete your profile with professional information
3. Find products you’ve genuinely used and select “Write a Review”
4. Provide comprehensive feedback meeting G2’s minimum length requirements
5. Complete verification steps including email confirmation

After your review passes moderation (typically 7-10 days), you’ll receive instructions for claiming your gift card reward.

How much exactly does G2 pay?

G2’s payment structure varies by product category and campaign, typically offering Amazon or Visa gift cards valued at:

• $10-15 for reviews of common business applications
• $15-25 for specialized software tools
• $25-50 for enterprise-level systems
• Up to $100 for targeted campaigns in underrepresented categories

Higher rewards generally correlate with more complex products or those needing additional reviews. Payments are processed within 1-2 weeks after review approval.

Can G2 reviews be anonymous?

G2 requires identity verification through business emails and optional LinkedIn connection but allows reviewers to limit public visibility of their personal information. Users can select a “partially anonymous” option that displays only their industry, company size, and job function without revealing names or employers. This balanced approach maintains accountability while protecting reviewers who wish to leave a review candidly.

Is G2 unbiased in its review process?

G2 strives for objectivity through several key practices:

• Standardized review collection methodology applied consistently across all products
• Verification requirements that filter out unqualified or fraudulent submissions
• Transparent display of vendor relationships including whether companies are paying customers

However, the platform’s incentivized review model and vendor subscription services create potential conflicts that users should consider when evaluating popular software with extremely positive or negative rating patterns.

↑